If you like this, you might also like:
- meet new people
- online community
- web application
- web 2
- toolbar search
- yahoo mail
- light contributor
- involved contributor
- collective knowledge
- internet community
- tech websites
- collective knowledge website
It had a slightly better track record than Britannica 10 years ago. Now, it's the source for most of my encyclopedic information. If I'm not familiar with a topic, I go here first. If I want more on a topic, I look for the references here as well as using Google. It's seriously good stuff.
Greatest thing to ever happen to me. Seriously. Haters say its inaccurate and whatnot but they'd just rather watch sitcoms and Vin Diesel movies.
Cons: Could be prettier, citation does not automagically make something true, bias, pro trollers, slimvirgin controversy, none of which significantly detracts from awesomeness
Has something about everything. Broad coverage, and you are guaranteed to get at least an idea of what you are looking for. Easy to understand and has more obscure or current topics
Cons: Questionable content. Do your own research if you need to get more than a general idea. Articles will sometimes contain glaring bias, or lack of focus (as contributors shift sections)
Surprisingly wide, deep, and authoritative considering that anyone can post.
Cons: Still cannot be fully trusted as a one-stop researching destination because it's just a glorified bulletin board of topics with anonymous posters. Requires follow-up research.